In 2004 John Howard said in an interview with the ABC that Pauline Hanson had no answers. He had no answers because they kept on coming swamping Australia. He failed to tell the people that he took her policy on processing illegal boat people off shore in 1998.

Australians are very compassionate and have welcomed many people from all nationalities to embrace our country over the decades. Refugees came from Europe after the war and also many came from Vietnam seeking  a new life.

What most Australians don't want are people who believe they can claim refugee status when they are only choosing a new homeland and a cash cow to provide for them.

Refugees are people who flee their country for fear of their life. A person who passes through 7 countries and pays people smugglers up to $20,000 is not a refugee they are illegal immigrants!

The Gillard Labor Government has allowed our boarders to become unprotected. Illegal immigrants are given housing, medical, education, cigarettes to the cost of $1.5M approx per year, international phone calls costing $5M. This is only the tip of the iceberg.

Julia Gillard and Wayne Swan have set aside $2.8 Billion for this coming year. Have no doubt it will be close to double that amount under a Labor Government.

In 2011-2012 Australia's assistance to Indonesia was an estimated $558 Million, making it our largest bilateral aid program.

One Nation believes in temporary protection visas, foreign aid in return for the Government working with Australia to stop people smugglers and turning the boats back, any claiming refugee status with no papers should be automatically refused entry.

At the end of the day Government\s and Leaders come and go but we are left with the residue. Wake up Australia!






Ian j Nelson

05/05/2013

WHY SHOULD YOU SUPPORT ONE NATION IN THE SENATE?

We have plenty of career politicians already. We have plenty of ambitious men and women wanting
only to further their own personal power, wealth and the influence of their own Party. People
who have never had a real job in the real world, so called leaders who wish to bend the reality to
suit their own beliefs. We have an ever quickening corruption on every front, virtue mocked and
expedience applauded, and here and now is the future that was earned by that decline.

Freedom isn’t free at all. It comes at a very high price. Thousands of Australians have paid the
ultimate sacrifice to give us the freedom we take for granted nowadays. A freedom that is gradually
slipping away. Individuality, small business and proper Christian values are gradually becoming
something of a lesser value. Was their sacrifice in vain?

One Nation is passionate about our country and is still fighting to regain what was best, and now
lost, in our society. Men and women should be able to go about their work and play , providing for
their families and loved ones without constantly being worried by the way their country is being
run, degraded by politicians who lack vision and the courage to do what is right for us and future
generations of Australians. They are good at talking, how about results? (Just one example, given
the opportunity, One Nation would stop the illegal boats in 24 hours! All it takes is new orders
given to our navy. A navy paid by our taxes and supposed to protect us and not be complicit in an
invasion). Patriotism is not a dirty word. To love your country is not something to be ashamed of.
Politicians are elected to represent the people who voted for them, not their party or vocal minority
groups, or the U.N. They cannot be trusted

We cannot continue to be a community of innocent bystanders. We are all guilty if we do nothing.
Someone has to start turning things around. We need people of solid human values, reliable as
friends, and with genuine sympathy for others in difficulty. People with uncompromising courage
of their convictions. People who are honest. Yes honest, a value long lost in Australian politics. We
need a passion for goodness in politics, not expediency and power plays. It is not all about dollars
and cents and politics and power and repaying favours. It’s about Australia and her people. We must
be one people in one united Christian nation.

Jim Savage One Nation senate candidate for Queensland.

01/05/2013


Competition is always good, right? But it is simply astounding how the press have fallen over themselves to enlighten the public about Clive Palmer's new party, United Australia Party. The only five policies he has announced so far are all vintage One Nation. Not that they are actually policies, more like mission statements. I agree with them, but hardly news as One Nation has been promoting these ideas for the last 15 years. Much the same can be said for Katter's party. Nothing new here at all.
 
One Nation is a mature seasoned party with long established policies, which have NOT CHANGED in 15 years. We don't bend with the wind or the latest opinion polls or whatever agendas the media set almost daily. Many of our policies have been quietly adopted by the major Parties as they know they make sense. A rare bit of reason and common sense on their behalf.
 
One Nation is not run by lobbyists, corrupt Party hacks, business interests, failed members of other parties who were happy to get elected on different policies then change horses later, or the party executive. The breakaway LNP M.Ps complained of bullying and threats from their Party bosses. These are the same people who run our state and country. All the combined reasons why Katter, Palmer, and the breakaway M.P.s did what they did is why One Nation was formed by Pauline Hanson all those years ago. They are simply reinventing the wheel.  One Nation built that wheel!

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   

Is there any difference between us minor Parties? Absolutely! One Nation does not shy away from the real tough questions. We openly oppose gay marriage, and we openly say we would in fact physically turn the boats around. That's why we pay taxes for a Navy for God's sake! We do not lamely say,  "That is a matter for the individual". People expect to know what it is we PERSONALLY stand for if we wish to get their vote. If we want to get elected we must say what we stand for, just saying "it is a Party matter", is a cop out (as Clive Palmer said on Sunday 28th April).

The reason these men will not commit to a personal response is because they are AFRAID of a possible backlash from the press and minor vocal fringe groups.
 
One Nation has more courage than all of them put together! A man should act like a man and say what he thinks, not hide behind supposed democracy to say nothing.
 
One Nation is the only option if the people of Queensland want true honest representation and not another bloody mindless politician.  One Nation wants the Coalition to win government. We know we cannot form government nor would we be so arrogant or experienced enough to do so. Katter and Palmer want to govern outright, with a totally inexperienced team (if they have one). We will not do to Australia what Oakshot and Windsor, the Independents,  have done. We will not divide the conservative vote.
 
 If we win seats we WILL support the Coalition, unconditionally, we want Labor out,  but we will be there to keep the Coalition honest and to be there to warn Australians when Abbott gets up to anything sneaky, which he will.
 
A vote for One Nation is a vote for your democratic rights to be upheld and your voice to be heard. We will be the lone voice of reason among the Party hacks, lobby groups and self interest groups. Our strong record speaks for itself.
 
Jim Savage
Senate Candidate for Queensland

24/04/2013

Tony Abbott says we need a change of government but not to vote for any minor Parties.                    
                                                                                                                                                                               
                                               Jim Savage

1/ Do we need a change of government? Absolutely !
 
2/ Will the next government be a Liberal/National coalition? Absolutely!
 
3/ Do we want Abbott to have such a huge majority that he will be totally unaccountable? Absolutely NOT!
 
A few minor Party representatives in Canberra will be the only voice for any alternate ideas and the only watchdog to keep an eye on Abbott's "Born to Rule" image of himself. Remember Abbott promised to DOUBLE the number of asylum seekers only 3 years ago if it would convince Tony Windsor to support him. Now he says he'll stop the asylum seekers completely. Which is it Tony?. He will do anything to get the top job. His last real concern is the people of Australia, he wants one thing and one thing only, to be Prime Minister. He is deceitful, dishonest and an egotist.
 
1/ He will PRIVATIZE our essential services saying he has a mandate, like Newman is doing in Queensland.
 
2/ He will continue to sell Australia to highest bidder
 
3/ He and his mate Howard NEVER returned a single boat while in power for 9 years. Not a single one! They accepted them all, after wasting hundreds of millions of dollars putting them in offshore detention centres for a few years first. 95% of all illegal invaders were accepted by the Howard/Abbott government for settlement in Australia.  According to the latest Govt. figures, 97% of these people are still on the dole, and probably always will be. Who is going to employ them for God's sake? Would you?
 
Vote for One Nation in the Senate in Queensland and send a choke collar to Canberra to put on the attack dog Abbott!
 
Jim Savage. One Nation Senate candidate, Qld.
0405390757

                                       
17/04/2013

  I am delighted that Mr. Ettridge is suing Tony Abbott,  for his partly successful attempt to pervert the course of justice by orchestrating people to give false evidence against himself and Pauline Hanson. Fortunately the High Court saw through this and ordered "no case to answer" and both David and Pauline were instantly released from prison.
Abbott was terrified of a party that threatened his "born to rule" position and was prepared to pay for a result beneficial to himself and his Liberal party.
One Nation has evidence to support this, although hardly necessary as Abbott himself admitted his crime on Sixty Minutes several years ago, interestingly with no police charges to follow. He admitted he promised to ensure certain people would, "..not be out of pocket..", paid by himself. This is a matter of public record. The man is in my opinion, a blatant liar, when he now denies this.
 

Now we are delighted that the great woman herself will run again. Pauline is what Australia needs now more than it did back in the 90's when 25% of Australians supported her right to speak for the disenfranchised. Pauline is needed now more than ever. Everything she said before has either come true or is still happening
 Pauline will have every support One Nation can give her here in Queensland if she chooses to run for a seat here. We need  politicians who aren't simply gutless party hacks and opportunists and who do exactly what they are told by their bosses behind closed doors.
There are no Barry O'Sullivans in One Nation!                                                                                                                

 

   

              Jim Savage      Senate candidate for One Nation Qld..

 

The only language these people will ever understand is to turn the boats around, or, deport them on arrival! They are here to bludge off the Australian tax payer through our generous welfare system.

We now know that these people have sold up in their homelands to pay the boat captains to get them to Australia, so they can live off our welfare!  We now know these are NOT asylum seekers, they are not refugees, they are lying illegals that should be deported on arrival back to the port they came from!

The blame rests with Labor for Australia's complete loss of our border sovereignty!  These people are not "asylum seekers" they are not "refugees" these people have crossed up to eight Muslim countries to get to Indonesia, pay boat captains $20,000 Australian to get on their boats and when they leave Indonesia for their "Pot of Gold" Australia, they destroy their ID.

  Our government is now being coerced into accepting them because they bring children. Do any of you see these people as willful bloody liars and we Australians are now throwing our vulnerable seniors/pensioners out of their homes to make room for these bludgers!                      



                                                                                                                                                                                  
                                                      We are the laughing stock of the world                   


Ian j Nelson

28th. May 2012

This letter was sent to the Country Life on the 19/05/2012 but was ignored! We however think it is relevant and important. We ask The Country Life to keep politics out of their rag!

Ian j Nelson


Letter to the Editor,
Country Life.
 
Dear Sir,                                                                                   19 – 5 - 2012
BAT MADNESS
 
Bat madness is still adversely affecting peoples brains as demonstrated in comments appearing in Ashley Walmsley’s article C/L 16 / 5 / 2012.
         
The current lunatic bat loving policy of the past Labor government has its followers who were happy to label farmers Rednecks when they want to protect their crops to provide food for humans instead of bats.
 
A step in the right direction by the LNP to balance this issue is still a pathetic jelly leg toe in the water approach to the potentially dangerous over population bat problem.
         
The LNP needs to beat the drum of sanity now well beyond their ineffective current position and not wait for the potential Armageddon.
         
From the USA Times 25 / 4 / 2012;  in France: “ Scientists studying bats have found dozens of new members of a virus family linked to human diseases”
         
It is now worthy of the LNP to note history and the facts of history to cut government interference ,cost, and the big stick approach.

For the last 100 years farmers have been protecting many of our food crops from a broad range of predatory animals with their preferred weapon, the gun.

The use of guns to protect crops from excessive flying fox attack has not wiped out the species. This fact has a simple explanation: “ It was never the farming community’s intent.” To me this clearly demonstrates that farmers left to their own devices for survival are overwhelming a responsible lot.
         
Take note LNP and act decisively and strongly to correct Labor’s past madness on this issue. Remove the $100,000 fine or 1 year imprisonment.

Government credibility can not be restored whilst this virtual blackmail threat is in place.

Restore the farmer’s  fundamental right to protect their crops with the gun, no permit required, other means by permission if necessary.
         
Issue permits to local councils or other responsible groups to reduce the flying fox numbers in town camps; some will die some will move on, in the end a balance will be restored in all the farmer’s , consumer’s and flying fox’s interests.
 
 
 
                             P. Wise
                             Wises Farm, Wises Rd
                             Maroochydore.
                             Qld.             4558.
 
                  Ph. number withheld.

 

18th. March 2012

None of the Labor government front bench have done a days work in any private sector whatsoever!  This is the result of Australia's once vibrant economy.  Small business after small business are closing down, broke!
Congratulations Comrade Poverty Gillard and Deputy Debt Swan it took you a very short time to achieve "the abyss" of poverty here in Australia, to middle Australians!

You cannot legislate the poor into prosperity by legislating the wealthy out of prosperity.   What one person receives without working for, another person must work for without receiving. 

The government cannot give to anybody anything that the government does not first take from somebody else.  You cannot multiply wealth by dividing it!  

When half of the people get the idea that they do not have to work because the other half is going to take care of them, and when the other half gets the idea that it does no good to work because somebody else is going to get what they work for, that is the beginning of the end of any Nation!

Ian J Nelson

 

15th. Febtuary 2012

Absolute Gluttony!

Friday 10th. February 2012


An expensive human side show


 
What really is going on here is in the context of the old political line " Never have an enquiry unless you know the results in advance."
 
For Anna Bligh with her hand picked judge the Queensland flood commission enquiry was coming along just fine leading up to the 2012 election, 15 million dollars well spent they would say.
 
Surprise? Surprise! No surprises there for the government,
 
The interim report was released that could influence public perception.
 
The most beautiful experience of all, with rainbow glitter, would come later, in the final flood report, with a clearance of incompetence for the government.
 
Anna Bligh and water utilities minister Stephen Robertson were, to the gullible people downwind, all beginning to smell like a bunch of beautiful red roses.
 
How good is that?
 
Just before the state election.
 
Just good luck would have been the call.
 
Spiteful people would have been the brand on those who would dare suggest designer luck.
 
Boom!
 
What went wrong?
 
How could it happen?
 
Why?
 
Why did the media bosses destroy Anna Bligh's preferred version of the flood enquiry report? They certainly busted it wide open and destroyed the credibility of many in high places.
 
Headley Thomas of The Australian was their weapon of choice, a brilliant investigative journalist who inspired The Courier-Mail journalists to be lap-dog followers.
 
However the Headley Thomas' of literature, are not the ones who inspire the following quotes: (American Free Press) Oct. 15, 2007   " The masters of the media decide who are 'heroes' and who are the 'villains'.

They can make or break any politician overnight with the snap of a finger and that is real power."                  

Friday August 31, 2007, the Courier-Mail:

"Politicians might like to think that they alone set the policy agenda for any given election, but the reality is  the media, the print and electronic has a huge role in deciding what issues voters will think about on their    

way to the polling booth. We call this an agenda setting ability, one to which pressure and community groups can also contribute."            
    
Using Headley Thomas's investigation the media bosses did the right thing when they exposed the flood commission's shonky investigation, however with the power of choice non disclosure was their alternative option.
If Headley Thomas is above the culture of naivety then an informative story awaits his investigation, with all the reasons why his media bosses printed his story.

Headley Thomas however having reached the summit of credibility with his investigative journalism has failed to maintain consistency.

His story line "ANALYSTS"  The Australian 8 – 2 – 2012 page 8 erodes his credibility, a groveling, patronizing,  pat on the back lovey, for Anna Bligh and her involvement in the flood wreckage of 2011.
Whilst first labeling opinionated people as conspiracy theorists he throws sweet lines for Anna without a clue as to facts, two examples are prominent " Bligh's intelligence has never been in question", " Her decision to establish the enquiry could not have been made for political reasons"  ( Most intelligent people would consider both statements untrue.) 
          
Adjoining Headley's 'Analysts' article on the same page another article states Mr. Robertson, Anna Bligh's water minister, was involved in a crucial phone hookup with dam engineers on the 10^th January 2011 two days before Brisbane flooded.

The 17 page transcript, of the hookup, does not record the minister saying a single word though he was informed that Wivenhoe dam was 52% above full supply level and still rising.
 A question arises – Is Robertson a reality version of the American TV satire show Homer Simpson? At least Homer in the same situation would have said DAR!.
 Headley if Anna Bligh is not responsible in the end for the dam mismanagement as your left leaning writing suggests, on this occasion, then obviously you would support the sea captain of the Costar Concordia by writing he is not responsible after the ship under his command sank when it recently slammed into rocks off the Italian coast..

It is now that Headley Thomas should stay strong and re-focus on the cause of the 2011 Brisbane flood and who is responsible. That big story is still to be told.
To help Headley in this regard is a quote from Madonna King's article on the subject in The Courier-Mail 11 – 2 – 2012 ; " I can imagine the stress these engineers were under. Context is also important here. Our state had been gripped by drought a year earlier, our focus was on water conservation. That was the pervading culture as water filled Wivenhoe."
There is the key Headley, "Focus was on water conservation."

Now Headley, read the "State of Mind" submission to the enquiry from the One Nation party, the pre-amble and the flood summary report, all produced 12 months ago and Note; " The state of mind" submission was presented three times, after being lost twice, to the flood commission over a 12 month period. before being recognized by the commission in summary.
Anna Bligh's government owns Seqwater and is therefore ultimately responsible for the management of the dam.
Through the lack of intervention Anna Bligh's labor possibly added to the height of the Brisbane flood level in 2011 and because of this it should be sacked by the people on election day.
 
                    Owl Link Research.        
 

January 27th. 2012


Submitted Feb. / March 2011

Submission to 2011 Flood Inquiry
 

This submission is based on “other matters” as referred to for submissions in the terms of reference.
 

Other matters to all aspects of the response to the 2010 / 2011 floods.
1.       Wivenhoe Dam control commanders said through the media that during the 2010 / 2011 flood the quantity of water build up and it’s release were governed by a written procedural manual.
2.       The Wivenhoe Dam was initially operative as a 60% flood water catchment with a 40% potable water recovery.
3.       The 1974 Brisbane flood was the catalyst to build the dam with 60%/40% configuration.
4.       In the mid 1980’s the then State government commenced planning for a second major dam to be called “The Wolfdene Dam”. It’s purpose when constructed was to greatly increase the volume of potable water to be made available to consumers in South East Queensland over the 40% available from the Wivenhoe dam.
5.       At the end of the 1980’s planning, resumption and ground work were nearing the stage where the dam could have been constructed during the 1990’s.
6.       In 1990 a different political party was sworn in as the government of Queensland and it immediately stopped the construction of this dam.
7.       Around 2000 / 2003 one or two reports were commissioned with advice to the State government and the Brisbane City council.
8.       The 2000 / 2003 reports suggested improvements to the Wivenhoe dam storage to flood mitigation and safety, suggesting a two stage improvement program.
9.       A third supplementary report was commissioned by the government that addressed the same issues as in the 2000 / 2003 reports. This report came up with different conclusions.
10.   From press accounts the Brisbane city council implemented the first of two stages before 2006. The second recommendation was not constructed and the State government would not contribute financially to the construction of either stage one or stage two!
11.   In 2007 the Wivenhoe dam water level was at a critically low potable water level.
12.   In 2007 the Queensland State government implemented a major water grid system in South East Queensland that included a desalination plant and a recycled sewrage water treatment system.
13.   In January 2011 Brisbane was extensively flooded and the Wivenhoe dam played a roll in the timing and intensity of that flood.
In January 2011 Brisbane was extensively flooded and the Wivenhoe dam played a roll in the timing and intensity of that flood.
 
 
This submission concentrates on “State of Mind”
 
The actual state of mind of those people making critical decisions at a point in time, decisions that could by influence, differ from a particular instruction directed by the written word.
Influences to form a state of mind can be real, positive or distractive, they can be sophisticated and subtle and performed over time or they can be immediate through agitation and aggression or simply be one’s knowledge of the desires of others who were in a sphere of influence.
Such inappropriate influence could distort and adversely restrict a humans ability to apply a positive trait. “Instinct,” by  way of common sense, to critical circumstances in instant time.
Through discovery,  an assurance by this commission must be forthright and convincing that no  political party, commercial group or individual gained favour through influences over genuine honest people to act knowingly or subconsciously in a manner detrimental in society in general.
To the repeated question of why? It is the opinion supporting this submission that the decision time frame relevant to this judicial enquiry starts in 1990 based on the decision in 1990 by the then Premier Wayne Goss to scrap the construction of the Wolfdene dam when it was to be an integral component for the efficiency of the operation of the Wivenhoe dam in time of flooding.
1.       Why did Wayne Goss as Premier stop the construction of the Wolfdene dam?
2.       Why did he act so quickly without submitting an alternative option?
3.       Why did Jim Soorley  (Mayor of Brisbane at that time) proceed with recommended flood mitigation improvements to the Wivenhoe dam in the early 2000’s without State government technical and financial support?
4.       Why did Premier Beattie fail to support Mayor Soorley on stage one and two of the recommendations?
5.       Why did Premier Beattie ignore flood mitigation of Wivenhoe and proceed with a highly expensive water grid when such a project could not immediately serve the major water crisis? (Lack of water in 2007)
6.       Why did Premier Bligh not apply benefits from Premier Beattie’s water grid related to available quantities of potable water supply to the level of the Wivenhoe dam prior to the build- up of the 2010 / 2011 wet season? (Major alternative supplies were readily available).
It is respectfully suggested that all questions and answers directly relate to the “State of Mind” at the time of these decisions.
A state of mind from Wayne Goss in 1990, Jim Soorley in 2003, Peter Beattie in 2007 and Anna Bligh in 2010/2011 and the state of mind of those in control of the operational workings of the Wivenhoe dam and others relevant to this enquiry existed and ultimately caused this tragedy!   
 

24th. January 2012

Updated from our article 27th. January 2011

The disastrous flood of 2011 in Brisbane Queensland that includes the multi billion dollar flood damage to Brisbane properties has caused so much pain, suffering and loss to many, including the working poor who Premier Bligh will means test to salvation, was of almost "Biblical proportions" said Peter Beattie.

Blame God! said Beattie. If there is a relevance in this area why not blame the Devil? But of course there is no relevance.
Beattie's statement must surely be the mother of all blame diversions. So profound is Beatties statement it boarders on blasphemy, highlighted by the fact that his utterings on misinformation is unforgiving. It is typically political, especially when Beattie is one of those involved and who is a person who could evaluate the evidence that largely suggests the recent Brisbane flood was man made by a litany of Labor political decisions with an intensity of incompetence that boarders on negligence!

The foundation  for this disaster was laid in 1990 by Wayne Goss when he cancelled the construction of the proposed Wolfdene Dam that was almost ready for construction by the Bjelke-Peterson government.

In 2011 after this flood disaster, Wayne Goss is the number one person of interest in unravelling this catastrophe! What vision did he apply as an alternative engineering principles to the construction of the dam and what other applicable technical principles did he consider in his decision cancel the construction.

The Wolfdene dam was proposed by Bjelke-Peterson and his advisers as an integral component of the 60%-40% flood retardation / water usable supply of the Wivenhoe dam. Goss's action now appears totally unjustified.

Why did he do it?

He must be asked under oath at the pending inquiry to explain why.

It has not gone without notice that both Goss and Hammell are back! Why?  At the same time Kevin Rudd was a chief staffer to Goss and David Hammell was in his cabinet.

The number two person of extreme interest is Peter Beattie. Wow, what a guy! He couldn't comprehend the history of weather, even the basics of when you have a drought the next major event would be a flood.

Jim Soorley the former Brisbane Mayor could see it, while Beattie chose not to.  Soorley commissioned a report in 2003 that led his council to plan for a two stage upgrade of the Wivenhoe dam to insure Brisbane against further flooding.

Stage one was completed before 2006 with three fuse plugs installed to blow up a section of the earth wall to assist in an emergency measure. A system that was so close (1/2 of one metre, 500cm) to being activated in the present flood to save the main wall from water flow over the top.

Stage two to this day in 2011 has not yet been built. Work that would have raised the dam wall at a cost of around two hundred million dollars at the time and saved an additional five times the amount of water that is being held currently in a flood emergency.

The damage bill for this 2011 flood disaster to Brisbane city and environs will exceed 10 billion dollars for the sake of 250 million back in '06.

Why was this wall not built?

Why did Beattie not support it's construction?

Beatties government with Anna Bligh as a cabinet minister did nothing here, not even to the point of financially assisting the Brisbane city council with it's outlay of 80 million dollars on stage one!

It would have been reasonable at the time for people to support the council position to go cold on stage two if the Beattie government was not prepared to financially assist further flood proofing of the Wivenhoe dam.

Beattie's position, of spend nothing do nothing approach to future extended flood proofing to protect Brisbane, is flawed logic locked in Beattie's mind.

His logic extended right up to and beyond his government's panic explosion in 2007 when the Brisbane water supply was at 20% of it's maximum capacity.

Panic planning was placed in speed mode, time was of the essence, where the cost / benefit ratio to the taxpayer appears to have been irrelevant. Seen to be doing something became very important and political survival became paramount.

In the panic environment the plan was born (In hindsight a financial disaster) to tap into local council dams, build a desalination plant, build a system to recycle sewerage into drinking water, create a diversion for distraction, a flawed planned dam proposal in the Mary river valley, and spend millions of dollars on the project to make it look like a real solution.

Previously Beattie had failed with his cloud seeding adventure (cost unknown) fortunately for the taxpayers he did not attempt to boil stones to release water vapor so mad was his political thinking at the time anything was on the planning table!

Quickly Beattie rolled out his 9 billion dollar plan (money borrowed) with checks and balances unknown.  Lucky contractors gorged on Beattie's easy money as highlighted in a Sunday Mail article 18th. May 2008, 2.4 billion dollar water proposal blowout..and the final bill is likely to be much higher. This outrageous statistic achieved in the first 12 months of construction. The irony of it all is that if Beattie's 9 billion dollar folly had not expended 1 dollar then the whole of Brisbane would still be no worse off today with it's water needs. A damming indictment of Peter Beattie's mega incompetence' appears to be a light description!

Beattie should also front the enquiry into the 2011 floods and explain his actions where hindsight is not a legitimate escape route to follow.

Person of interest number 3, is Anna Bligh, Beattie's trusted lieutenant who was a senior member of his cabinet.


 

Clearly there are questions raised here that can only be answered by Wayne Goss, Peter Beattie and Anna Bligh and all must front the enquiry if it is deemed to be credible. And "terms of reference" must be wide ranging.

It would appear that what could be revealed from the enquiry is that political incompetence and interference played a large roll in the Wivenhoe flood control procedure and actual operations.

Now after the Brisbane flood and other events Bligh's budget has no substantial funds to adequately  assist people with huge losses through no fault of their own.

One Nation's position to Bligh's nightmare will be ignored by the media but the facts are on record and cannot be denied. One Nation has policies since 1998, and if implemented would have saved sorrow and hardship to thousands.

The media are resisting, though they cannot ignore, good can emanate from sound intelligent One Nation policies.

Statistics prove that the 2011 floods could be easily repeated at any time negating the luxury of years (36 years since the last major flood) to the next event.

What must be avoided is the public forced to endure another fast mad knee jerk solution in lieu of a change of government.

The truth and solutions are found here on our website!

         Ian j Nelson    State Director One Nation Queensland

22nd. December 2011


An Australian citizen doesn't have to look hard to find our alleged representative Federal government or it's lame- brained Opposition have no idea how to stop this insidious invasion by illegal immigrants!  Their are some who term these illegals as "Asylum Seekers" but those pathetic opportunists obviously do very well off of this industry, for most part, they are as bad as the people smugglers themselves!

Reports announced that the Indonesian Intelligence warned the Australian Intelligence that there was a boat coming with over 280 illegals on board. So if the Indonesians knew this, why in God's name did they not stop them from leaving in the first place? 

We in One Nation would call a moratorium and review all the Aid we send to Indonesia until such times that they take this crisis seriously!  The time has come for all Australians to reconsider who they vote for come next election as the two major parties have had power too long, they are just full of themselves, they have become "self-righteous" sanctimonious morons who believe themselves to be "The only Ones born to rule" and as Australians have found over the last traumatic years They are not capable of this incredibly responsible task as all they do is talk about each other, argue amongst themselves whilst this once great Nation spirals downward into the "Abyss" of hopelessness! 

Whilst all this is happening we have 370,000 homeless Australians, we have over half the workforce who are "the working poor", these are our fellow Australians who the major's treat with absolute contempt and indifference!  If there is ever a time for Australians to WAKE UP the time is now! We can no longer allow these un-intelligent people to destroy this Nation by Gradualism as they are now doing.

One Nation needs a say in the next Federal election and hopefully we can neutralize that lunatic party "The Greens" who have exacerbated this whole issue!

Now is the time!

 Jim Savage State President and Candidate for Beaudesert  

 12th. December 2011


" Eyes wide open " is now a critical requirement for Australians to enhance survival of their present lifestyle. Remember the good days of the last 50 years?
           
In these dangerous social experimental times that are upon us multiculturalism is a profound pox, a cancerous scourge principle that slowly in silence eats away the harmonious soul of any united prosperous assimilated society.

Multiculturalism the social experiment hatched after the second world war is now condemned in major countries as an expensive, frightening, dangerous failure.

In Australia today there are people among us with political immunity and tax funding who ignore world trends when they conflict with their subtle ideology. Like virtual social traitors this ideology still influences, twisted minds that are still champions of this putrid identity destroying concept.
           
To Australians, this real danger to the society as we know it today is only equalled by the broad brotherhood alliance of Muslim incomparability in its proliferation and Western politicization.
Anna Bligh's ideology pressures dictate a rank multicultural policy document highlighted when convenient.

This tax funded propaganda parcel craves for justification and credibility when that credibility chasm is exposed by many facts. The Bligh government has a one eyed approach to a serious social issue when it ignores options like the purity and benefits associated with immigration assimilation which equals integration.

Gillard's Labor, Rudd and Brown's Greens love the disunity of multiculturalism where the three key elements of  the pox are promoted, i.e. identity theft, economic decline and human mongrelization all foundation stones for a new society embracing socialism – communism.
           
In the exclusive and extremely alarming article by Patricia Karvelas in The Australian on Wednesday 23 November 2011 "ALP eyes tougher anti-hate laws" two abused words are prominent Anti-hate and Racism equally disturbing are government rubbery assurances.
           
The article starts " Tougher legal protections against racism are being consolidated by the Gillard government as it overhauls Federal anti-discrimination Legislation,"  and follows with  government double take rubbery rhetoric and then quotes " These comments came after reports in The Australian on proposals for the introduction of a National multiculturalism act to further protect ethnic groups against racism." Then it said the government has released a discussion paper on the issue and the Attorney General's department is conducting consultations on the issue in the paper. The government awaits the outcome of those consultations with interest.
           
The disturbing point here is that I have not seen the discussion paper, I have not been given the opportunity to voice an opinion. Have you? the fact is you and I together with the rest of the voters have no say on these critical issues but the race commissioner has.
           
Helen Szoke said " The race discrimination act should be strengthened against racism and to enhance multiculturalism." A clear example of forging ahead with a flawed position, ignore the options, ignore history and ignore proven failure. One would hope with the  name Szoke a one eyed biased approach is not her style.

What society must be vigilant against is biased opinion forging ahead with legislation that totally ignores mass public opinion support where multiculturalism is enshrined in protective legislation to avoid scrutiny when it is known already to be a stinking pox on advanced societies.
           
To their meager credit Abbott's coalition has a keen eye on the matter. However like a two headed snake chopping off one head does not diminish the chance of being fatally bitten.
At no time since Federation has the credibility of Australian politics been so diminished as it is today by lying, personal self interest, total loss of border protection, blatant new taxes, small business depression and economic decline.
           
Over the last 12 years none of the above realities can be attributed to that invented political devil that smokescreen illusion of the major parties with media duplicity "One Nation."
           
Try some good advice if the chance arises in your electorate at the 2012 state election. Give the One Nation candidate your primary vote, that is your number one vote. A small surge for One Nation would see the pigs squeal and the feathers fly.
           
There is no risk associated with promoting this event when the nation is morally bankrupt with a flat line economy.                                   

Owl Link research.
 

The amendments to the Weapons Act 1990 are number 1 on the agenda for government business in parliament TOMORROW (Tuesday 15th November).  Government business commences at around midday - we'll be there.  Come and join us if you can.
Please email the Minister and your local MP NOW to object to this Bill.  Follow the link below to see what the amendments are (magazine limitations, banning most folding knives including Stanley knives by categorising them as flick knives, and doubling of penalties are the worst of the amendments).
http://www.legislation.qld.gov.au/Bills/53PDF/2011/WeaponsAmB11.pdf
Here's the Minister's email address and a link to the addresses of all Queensland MPs. 
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
http://www.parliament.qld.gov.au/members/current/list
Do it NOW please so that the Minister and your local MP knows what you think of these "non-contentious  items"!   Thanks for your support and your action on this one .
Kind regards

Rob Harrold
Shooters Union