New Page 2

ONE NATION is a political party representing the people of Australia who are concerned that their will is being ignored by the two party system. One Nation is committed to Australian sovereignty, the Constitution and Government of the People by the People for the People. Based on this view, we have developed objectives and policies reflecting the will of the people. Our role as a political party is to select and recommend to the people, candidates that we feel reflect our objectives and policies and are worthy of representing them and their will as dedicated parliamentary representatives.

Has anyone been following the actions on the periphery of the current US economic crisis.

I refer to the Oil and Gas cartel engendered by Russians and the Chinese ably assisted by Venezuela and now, it appears, by the Swiss. The Americans are mainly the ones who suffer from this action, along with anyone silly enough to be connected to them through Parity pricing and that of course, is us in Australia.

The so-called Singapore daily spot price is being manipulated by the major oil companies with the full support of the Australian government.

Not one oil refiner pays the spot price as shown nightly on TV at the bottom of the stock exchange reports, except as top up supplies when demand outstrips suply .

That is why the spot price is shown with the stock exchange report, because it is a part of something called ‘Futures gambling’. Just as all Futures are a gamble on the possibility of “buying cheap now and selling for a profit at a later given date”.

It is purely a gamble on rising prices. All refiners buy their oil on long term contracts at, (as close as we can determine) about $10 dollars per barrel, and it suits to have traders working for oil companies who will willingly inflate spot prices to justify an artificially inflated retail pump price. Remember also they are gambling on buying and selling their own products.

Why does the Government allow the public to be manipulated like this? Because it greatly affects the way our, and the world’s economy is reported in economic growth. In our case, if the sale of fuel was controlled as it should be and only the small amount of oil bought at these prices was shown separately, quarterly economic growth in Australia would read very differently. In other words the government would not be able to claim our economy is stable or continuing to grow so easily. Just look at what has happened to the financial industry lately with growing interest rates, particularly with the Federal Reserve allowing the Banks to raise rates above the official rate, which has a direct detrimental effect on growth.

It is important to note that Australia is almost self-sufficient in oil for fuel as opposed to other countries and, in particular, America who must import oil to meet needs. Happily we do not have those pressures, with little need for oil for heating.

We could almost have a national oil distribution at realistic prices without the need to rely on imports to any great degree, particularly if we increased local refining ability and started to fully exploit petrol from gas and shale.

Why don’t we? One answer could be because more than half the retail pump price is government tax. ie; at $1-40 per liter 70cents + is TAX.

It is hard to find a parallel industry where both the foreign owned company and the government of the day are ripping so much off the public for a necessary staple item.

Forget the so-called new “Fuel Watch Department” which is only going to cap fuel for 24 hours. It will do nothing to control rising prices set by manipulation.

It is time to demand that Kevin Rudd forces refiners and distributors to declare publicly the true cost of a barrel of oil on contract price and get off “world parity” and, more importantly, to cut oil taxes and the exploration levy, all of which could bring the pump price back to about 50-60 cents per litre.

So, people it should be clear that it is nothing more than ‘smoke and mirrors’ that determines the fuel price.

It is timely to mention the price of Autogas all of which is produced locally without imports, now costing about 70 cents per litre at the pump, but sold to China on a 25 year contract at 03 cents per litre. C.I.F.

Another important factor is the direct impact on inflation, this, and rising food prices have.

We hear continually how inflation must be controlled, and of course the way our Government chooses to do this is to allow Bankers to move interest rates at will.

No one seems to understand that the simplest way to control inflation is to control goods being offered for sale and in turn the price these goods are offered at…

Rudd’s first Budget…..confirms Labor’s big Government, big spending philosophy as expected.

Following an outcry from pensioner groups and some recent media expose, Rudd, on the spot said he would institute a review of pensions. Too little too late,

He well knew that our older generation was doing it tough, he was told often enough during the campaign and choose to ignore the people who told him they could not live on 250 dollars a week.

Well Mr Rudd you may have truly shown your colors and may well pay for it at the next election, or maybe a small adjustment soon will defuse the issue.

One Nation has within its policies a drive to double the existing pension payment when it gains parliamentary members and to cap rates paid by pensioners to enable people to cope with ever increases in charges, in some cases which have forced pensioners to unwillingly sell to downsize their dwellings.

One of the factors which has lead us to this somewhat dramatic increase in pensions is the little known fact that all current pensioners who worked in the 40’s-50’s-60’s and 70’s have a credit balance owing to them from having paid in those years into a forced retirement levy fund which a former Federal Government, (LABOR), dismantled and transferred into General Revenue. In other words they stole the money from the fund which individually belonged to those workers and was supposed to be held until their retirement. This is a matter of record and I believe a Court challenge would see this money reinstated, maybe!!, given the state of the separation of powers our country was founded on.

I appeal to all readers to support and spread the word that only One Nation will fix the pension debacle.

Queries to One Nation Queensland State Office 07-32874440 Fax. 32874448 email. onenation@optusnet.com.au

No Traveston Dam!

We have footage on Fraser Island, of millions of litres of water so pure, it holds little or no life in it, being wasted into the sea daily!

Why is this allowed to happen? This precious resource wasted, and your Queensland government wants you to drink recycled sewerage!

Click here for Powerpoint display

Letter to the Editor, 7-5-2007

Dear Sir,

Since the last State Election I have watched with extreme interest Beattie’s Traveston Crossing Dam strategy. Divisive by design, where the truth is lost in a sea of misinformation and tailored at a huge taxpayer cost, to cover for his government’s water management incompetence.

Campaigning in the last election for Gympie One Nation heavily promoted an option to pump fresh water from Fraser Island’s obvious enormous reserves. Travel to Fraser and see for yourselves!

Then like now, a wall of silence prevails as to the potential of this resource where hundreds of millions of litres are wasted to the sea daily. Contrasting with this fact is the Queensland Governments latest $2 million tax funded campaign “Target 140” exploiting fear to save dam water usage.

The Government's water grid map displayed in “the courier mail” on 29^th. March 2007 identified North Stradbroke Island and Bribie Island as sources of ground water, but again no mention of the vast reserves of pure water on Fraser Island!Fraser Island is protected by the State Conservation act. Federally, by Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation act. To these, Beattie’s Government felt it necessary to add the “Wild Rivers act.” 2005.

In 2004 a programme on the ABC suggested that our control of Fraser Island may have been “Corporatised” and relinquished to overseas powers. We have a right to know, are these issues being raised in the Traviston Dam debate?

One Nation research suggests that we may no longer control the Natural Resources on Fraser Island. Further information is available on One Nation websites.

P. Wise

Global warming Eh? Here under a petition of around 17000 well qualified scientists who basically say its rubbish!

Global Warming Petition

We urge the Australian and U.S. governments to reject the global warming agreement that was written in Kyoto, Japan in December, 1997, and any other similar proposals. The proposed limits on greenhouse gases would harm the environment, hinder the advance of science and technology, and damage the health and welfare of mankind.

There is no convincing scientific evidence that human release of carbon dioxide, methane, or other greenhouse gasses is causing or will, in the foreseeable future, cause catastrophic heating of the Earth's atmosphere and disruption of the Earth's climate. Moreover, there is substantial scientific evidence that increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide produce many beneficial effects upon the natural plant and animal environments of the Earth.

Explanation

Listed below are 17,200 of the initial signers

During the past several years, more than 17,100 basic and applied American scientists, two-thirds with advanced degrees, have signed the Global Warming Petition.

Signers of this petition so far include 2,660 physicists, geophysicists, climatologists, meteorologists, oceanographers, and environmental scientists (select this link for a listing of these individuals) who are especially well qualified to evaluate the effects of carbon dioxide on the Earth's atmosphere and climate.

Signers of this petition also include 5,017 scientists whose fields of specialization in chemistry, biochemistry, biology, and other life sciences (select this link for a listing of these individuals) make them especially well qualified to evaluate the effects of carbon dioxide upon the Earth's plant and animal life.

Nearly all of the initial 17,100 scientist signers have technical training suitable for the evaluation of the relevant research data, and many are trained in related fields. In addition to these 17,100, approximately 2,400 individuals have signed the petition who are trained in fields other than science or whose field of specialization was not specified on their returned petition.

Of the 19,700 signatures that the project has received in total so far, 17,800 have been independently verified and the other 1,900 have not yet been independently verified. Of those signers holding the degree of PhD, 95% have now been independently verified. One name that was sent in by enviro pranksters, Geri Halliwell, PhD, has been eliminated. Several names, such as Perry Mason and Robert Byrd are still on the list even though enviro press reports have ridiculed their identity with the names of famous personalities. They are actual signers. Perry Mason, for example, is a PhD Chemist.

The costs of this petition project have been paid entirely by private donations. No industrial funding or money from sources within the coal, oil, natural gas or related industries has been utilized. The petition's organizers, who include some faculty members and staff of the Oregon Institute of Science and Medicine, do not otherwise receive funds from such sources. The Institute itself has no such funding. Also, no funds of tax-exempt organizations have been used for this project.

The signatures and the text of the petition stand alone and speak for themselves. These scientists have signed this specific document. They are not associated with any particular organization. Their signatures represent a strong statement about this important issue by many of the best scientific minds in the United States.

This project is titled "Petition Project" and uses a mailing address of its own because the organizers desired an independent, individual opinion from each scientist based on the scientific issues involved - without any implied endorsements of individuals, groups, or institutions. The remainder of the initial signers and all new signers will be added to these lists as data entry is completed.

Our e-mail address, for the purposes of this project, is: info@oism.org

If you would like to mirror this site or download it to your hard drive, click here.

You may also view and print this entire web site in one easy step. END

Even with the current lower fuel prices, we are still being ripped off. All our research tells us long term contract oil costs are around $10-00 per barrel, not $60 or $70 as traded on the futures market or daily spot. Shortages are a myth!

State President	Jim Savage
State Vice President	Colin Law
State Secretary	Anne Law
State Director & Treasurer	Ian Nelson
State CEO	Rod Evans